THE SYSTEM, CLIMATE CULT AND A JOURNEY OF FAITH

An interview with James Delingpole

I have been struggling through the 11 UN Policy Briefs that are being used by the UN to lead us into Our Common Agenda – see this link.

Last week, I covered the first five policy briefs, and I am taking a break from the briefs this week because my eyes kept glazing over, and I thought I needed a fresh approach.

However, I am particularly excited about Policy Brief 7 – Outer Space. Once again, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) come to the fore, and the policy paper says:

“UN entities should increase collaboration, including through UN-Space, to better coordinate data-sharing, building system capacity and cooperating on the procurement of space-based information, to accelerate the application of space assets to achieve the SDGs. UN entities should advance the equal participation of women in the aerospace sector.”

There were several things of interest here. Firstly, space assets are going to be used to achieve the SDGs (perhaps a lethal beam from outer space?), and equal participation of women in the aerospace sector will be advanced. However, I suspect that the UN doesn’t even know how to define a woman. I also didn’t know that there was such an entity as “UN-Space”.

With some searching, I discovered something that I think is UN-Space and it’s called UNOOSA – The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs and their great logo – Access to Space For All

Figure 1. Logo of the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs

I’m supportive of this UN program. Outer space looks like a great place for the UN to be relocated!

However, there is one fascinating graph from UN Policy Brief 11 that shows the number of satellites registered to be launched in the future, compared to the past. Soon there will be little room left in space.

My advice – don’t sign up for Branson or Bezos’ space flights – you will almost certainly run into space debris!

Figure 2. Graphic from the United Nations Policy Brief 8 showing past and future satellite launches

However, we’ll leave outer space behind this week to focus on some background information about James Delingpole, whom I interviewed this week.

The James Delingpole Story

I had a break from the UN Policy Briefs this week to interview the noted UK journalist and “conspiracy realist”, James Delingpole. So – this week I am giving you some insight into James and his journey.

On James’ website, he describes himself this way:

“My life has been one of two halves. In the first, I was an aspirant member of the Establishment: educated at private school (Malvern) and Oxford; friend to future prime ministers; a pretty successful journalist, broadcaster and author; I helped break an important story called ‘Climategate’…

And in the second I threw the first half away when I woke up, found Jesus and realised that almost everything I thought I knew about the world was a lie. That’s when life starting (sic) getting interesting.”

James has had a fascinating life which, as he says: “had its moments”. These included the following:

“I dived with great white sharks; hung out with Jimmy Page and Robert Plant in LA; got altitude sickness on Mt Kilimanjaro; interviewed movie stars and rock stars too numerous to mention, but they included Tom Hanks, John Travolta, Harrison Ford, Samuel L Jackson and, Jon Bon Jovi, ….; rode round the Brands Hatch racetrack as the passenger of the world sidecar racing champion; took a Honda Fireblade round the Isle of Man TT course; travelled to the remotest safari destination in Africa; smoked lots of weed; went to countless gigs because for 20 years I was a music critic; reviewed restaurants, books, movies, cars, bikes, hotels; wrote novels including the Dick Coward series, set in World War II; made lots of lovely friends; married, had children, and was all set to live happily ever after.”

James then had “a great awakening”.

“Then came my Awakening. I didn’t choose it. No one does. Suddenly the world started looking very different, as I began to question all the things I had previously taken for granted as established fact: dinosaurs, the moon landings, the notion that 9/11 was planned by a man in a cave. If you’ve been there you’ll understand; if you haven’t then I wish you good luck on your future heroic journey, should you ever decide to undertake it.”

James is a person who has a mission like the ancient Sons of Issachar to “ understand the times” (1 Chronicles 12:32). As he said in the interview with me this week, he believes that he now has two missions:

1.     “To awaken people to the truth of what is going on in the world” and “to present in an entertaining way, what would otherwise be something so horrifying as to send one into the depths of despair”, and

2.     “Simultaneously to make people realize that actually, God is the answer, that all this was written, and that there is a divine plan…that God has got our back, that He sent his only son to die for our sins, and that if only we can accept this it's good news despite the darkness.”

James provokes a love-hate relationship with his readers and listeners. Many love him, and many hate him.

 I grew to appreciate James through his weekly interactions with Toby Young, the founder of the UK Free Speech Union – see this link. Their popular podcast was titled London Calling – see below

Toby and James had two different philosophies about the challenges we face in the world.

James essentially thought that the machinations were a “conspiracy”, whereas Toby thought it was a “cock-up”. These differences in views eventually led to London Calling coming to a halt in October last year, much to the dismay of their listeners.

An article from the National Review  in 2022 by Michael Brendan Dougherty, captured the differences in approaches of James and Toby, which also reflect some of the differences between many people on the conservative side of the political divide. Dougherty writes:

“Whereas once he (Delingpole) and Young were both basically libertarian-oriented Tories, now Delingpole has stopped caring about conventional politics. He sometimes has trouble working up any interest at all in the latest too-ing and fro-ing at Westminster. And this change has strained the relationship at the heart of the podcast, occasionally making me wonder if I was listening to the final episode.

For Delingpole, the sinister aims of our ruling class keep advancing whatever party is in power. Trump meant nothing. Brexit meant nothing. BoJo (Boris Johnson) was, if anything, just another tool of the establishment. The implementation of the World Economic Forum agenda — you’ll own nothing and love it — continues apace. Depopulation is the long-term goal. Soon we’ll have a full-blown social-credit system backed by central-bank digital currencies. In his remaining time before the onset of inescapable tyranny, Delingpole is experimenting with religion and psychedelics, and forswearing “the death jab” — Covid vaccination. This is the worldview of #TeamJames on the podcast.

On the other side of the ledger is #TeamToby, whose view is that our politics are for the most part genuine rather than fake, our leaders deluded and bumbling rather than as supremely capable as they would have to be to keep conspiracies of the sort Delingpole believes in going.”

In the conclusion to his wonderful National Review article – see this link, Dougherty writes:

“Maybe Klaus Schwab is going to press a button one day, draining my bank account before death-jabbing me and serving me as dinner to psychopathic transhumanists. Or maybe our ruling class has been discredited and something new and maybe a little better is already rising up to replace it. Either way, I’ll be damned if I’m going to lose any of my best friends fighting over which possibility seems more plausible.”

I thought that this assessment was important for all of us as we try to negotiate what will be increasingly difficult times. Somehow, despite our differences, we need to maintain relationships.

However, a time will come, I believe, when we have to make choices about how we talk with our friends and family. An increasingly clever surveillance state via AI will result in people close to us reporting those with opposing ideas to the authorities for having views that could be damaging to the State, just like the actions family members “dobbing in” close family to the East German Stasi during the Cold War.

James writes a substack – here is his latest post:

Some of the Cleverest People I Know Are Flat Earthers...

Given my writings about the UN’s Agenda 21, the 17 SDGs and the forthcoming UN Summit of the Future, I also recommend that readers listen to an amazing UK woman who has sought single-handedly, to bring the UN’s evil agenda to the attention of those in the UK. Listen to this podcast where James interviews Sandi Adams on the Delingpole podcast -

Here is also a link to all of James’ podcasts, called The Delingpod – see this link - where he has had a range of fascinating guests including Bart Sibrel, the man who presents convincing evidence in his book Moon Man that the moon landings were faked. I recommend Bart Sibrel’s book, which is a personal account of how the CIA tried to take him out for finding film evidence that the moon landings were staged.

James is a provocateur and seeker of truth who always makes you think about what you think you know and challenges your worldview and understanding of events that you thought were straightforward.

Delingpole and Technocracy

 James has been an important person in my awakening to the globalist agenda. I suddenly realized that the COVID-19 “pandemic” and all the consequences that flowed from this international planned event were not isolated but part of a much bigger picture.

In November 2020, James interviewed the noted author, Patrick Wood about Technocracy, which is a concept promoted in the 1920s and 1930s for global control, using energy as a currency. Here is a link to this podcast which is worthwhile listening to if you haven’t heard about the background to the technocratic agenda into which we are being shepherded. Listen at this link:

I interviewed Patrick Wood myself in November 2023 – see this link. As an overview about technocracy, in this post, I wrote that I came to the realization that what was happening with the COVID-19 crisis as part of a much bigger plan.

“There was a group of people (technocrats) who believed in a global dictatorship by scientists and engineers, who they believed were really the only ones qualified to run the world. Rather than this being a new phenomenon, it goes back a long way, and we discovered that there was a significant movement called Technocracy Inc.  -  that arose in the period immediately after World War I and was originally known as the Technical Alliance of North America. During the 1930s, technocracy became quite a substantial program that had at its core the replacement of the current political system with an economic system based on energy as the key currency. It would be run by scientists and engineers who the technocrats believed were the best qualified to implement this system, and there would be no need for politicians or democracy.”

James’ interview with Patrick Wood led to me reading all Patrick’s books, which I recommend  for a better understanding of technocracy and the plans that the New World Order has to control us all. Patrick Woods’ key books are Trilaterals Over Washington – Volumes I and II (2017), Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2014), Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order (2018) and his latest book published in 2022, The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism.

The COVID-19 “pandemic” had the fingerprints of technocrats all over it. Dr Anthony Fauci and similar government medical bureaucrats throughout the West were promoted as people who “knew the science”, and so our role was just to trust them. This was despite the 180-degree changes in recommendations (masks were of no value, but then they were essential; lockdowns had no merit and then were critical; vaccines could not be produced in time but suddenly were available and indispensable).

In Australia, the Dr Fauci equivalent told us that the AstraZeneca vaccine was completely safe, but some months later, we were told that the injection could cause blood clots and it was not recommended for younger people – see this link. For some reason, most people just believed the government because of the fear that the authorities induced.

Every Western government featured public health bureaucrats giving press conferences about a disease of which they had no first-hand knowledge and where they were not involved in treating any patients. We were told to “trust the science” (interestingly enough, this is the same phrase used with the climate change agenda), but much of “the science” was suppressed and any alternative opinions censored.

Delingpole, “Climategate” and Watermelons

I first became aware of James Delingpole in relation to “Climategate”-  a story from 2009 and 2011, now long forgotten. It remains important because the treasure trove of documents that were “leaked” from the  Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia , provided insight into the manipulation of meteorological data to promote the idea of “global warming”. Many academic snouts were in the trough of the climate change swill as funds flowed to the research unit to support the idea of a “climate crisis”.

James’ title of “Climategate” as a shorthand for the scandal, quickly caught the public imagination. It was an international scandal because the scientists at the heart of the whole issue were those determining “the science” via the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the United Nations body “for assessing the science related to climate change”.

On the 10^th anniversary of “Climategate” in 2019, an article written by Robert L. Bradley Jnr and published by the Institute for Energy Research – see this link - provided the following background:

“On November 19, 2009, a whistle-blower downloaded more than 1,000 documents and e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia University, United Kingdom. Posted on a Russian server, these documents were soon accessed by websites around the world.

These e-mails were a subset of confidential communications between top climate scientists in the UK, the United States, and elsewhere directly involved with surface temperature data sets, the “Hockey Stick” global-temperature reconstruction, and the assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Branded “Climategate” by British columnist James Delingpole, the communications gave rare insight into practices ranging from unprofessional to fraudulent. Bias, manipulated data, admissions of doubt, dodging transparency (and freedom of information requests), and efforts to subvert the peer-review process were uncovered. Richard Nixon might have blushed.”

In overview, Bradley wrote:

“This month marks the ten-year anniversary of Climategate. The episode was more than just “embarrassing and a public relations disaster for science,” as one sympathizer stated at the time. The leaked emails revealed a mainstream intellectual cartel trying to hype climate alarm by methodological tricks and resorting to secrecy and outright bullying”.

What followed were three formal enquiries in the UK, but the establishment closed ranks, and all the scientists who had seemingly manipulated and rigged data to support their hypothesis of global warming were absolved of any wrongdoing.

James Delingpole was the journalist who broke the story in a UK Daily Telegraph blog. He went on to write an excellent account of the whole story in his book Watermelons: The Green Movements True Colors, published in 2011 and available on Amazon Kindle. James is currently updating the book.

Watermelons – is an allusion to the fact that the climate movement is green on the outside but red (Communist) on the inside. The book description on Amazon says:

“Watermelons shows how the scientific method has been sacrificed on the altar of climate alarmism. Delingpole mocks the green movement’s pathetic record of apocalyptic predictions, from the “population bomb” to global cooling, which failed to materialize. He reveals the fundamental misanthropy of green ideology, “rooted in hatred of the human species, hell bent on destroying almost everything man has achieved”.

Delingpole gives a refreshing voice to widespread public skepticism over global warming, emphasising that the “crisis” has been engineered by people seeking to control our lives by imposing new taxes and regulations. “Your taxes will be raised, your liberties curtailed and your money squandered to deal with this ‘crisis’”, he writes.

At its very roots, argues Delingpole, climate change is an ideological battle, not a scientific one. Green on the outside, red on the inside, the liberty-loathing, humanity-hating “watermelons” of the modern environmental movement do not want to save the world. They want to rule it.”

I re-read Watermelons this last week and am amazed at how relevant the information is to our times. I highly recommend that readers buy the book (only easy on the Kindle at the moment). James has a style that is easy to read and synthesizes a lot of information about the green agenda that is essential to understand.

The climate movement has moved on and tried to forget “Climategate”, but James provides essential information about the background to the “climate crisis” and its links to globalism, collectivism and the New World Order. He concludes his book with the argument that there is no middle ground in relation to the great climate hoax:

“Either you believe, as I do, that we humans are essentially a beneficent presence on earth. Within certain legal and social constraints—such as property rights and the rule of law—we are all best left to our own devices, free from government interference, and we can generally be trusted to do the right thing and enjoy all those benefits that, history tells us, accrue from free markets and free trade and personal liberty. Or you take the pessimistic view that we’re a menace to be contained and constrained with ever-greater regulation and control from experts over whom we have no democratic control—and over whom we have no need of democratic control because, after all, they’re the experts and they have our best interests at heart. Rest assured, this kind of collectivism—in all of its ugly forms—will always end in tears. There is no middle way. Even if you think there is a middle way, the people who would wish to steal your freedoms and your democratic rights in the name of “environmentalism” have seen to it that there is not. It really is that simple: optimism or pessimism; freedom or tyranny; joy or misery. You choose.” (Delingpole, James. Watermelons: The Green Movement's True Colors . Publius Books. Kindle Edition.)

It was a delight to talk to James this week, and you can watch the interview below.

INTERVIEW WITH JAMES DELINGPOLE